TR2024-163
A Framework for Joint Vehicle Localization and Road Mapping Using Onboard Sensors
-
- "A Framework for Joint Vehicle Localization and Road Mapping Using Onboard Sensors", Control Engineering Practice, November 2024.BibTeX TR2024-163 PDF
- @article{Berntorp2024nov,
- author = {Berntorp, Karl and Greiff, Marcus}},
- title = {A Framework for Joint Vehicle Localization and Road Mapping Using Onboard Sensors},
- journal = {Control Engineering Practice},
- year = 2024,
- month = nov,
- url = {https://www.merl.com/publications/TR2024-163}
- }
,
- "A Framework for Joint Vehicle Localization and Road Mapping Using Onboard Sensors", Control Engineering Practice, November 2024.
-
MERL Contact:
-
Research Areas:
Abstract:
This paper presents a modeling framework for joint estimation of a host vehicle state and a map of the road based on global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and camera measurements. We model the road using a spline representation based on lower-dimensional Bézier curves parametrized in generalized endpoints (GEPs) with implicit guarantees of continuous lane boundaries. We model the GEPs by a parameter vector having a Gaussian prior representing the uncertainty of the prior map, and provide a systematic way of defining this prior from generic map representations. Both GNSS and camera measurements, such as lane-mark measurements, have noise characteristics that vary in time. To adapt to the changing noise levels and hence improve positioning performance, we formulate the problem as a joint vehicle state, map parameter, and noise covariance estimation problem and present two noise-adaptive linear-regression Kalman filters (LRKFs); (i) an interacting multiple-model (IMM) LRKF and (ii) a variational-Bayes (VB) LRKF. We conduct a Monte-Carlo study and compare the two approaches in terms of estimation precision and computation times. Embedded implementations in an automotive-grade dSpace Micro Autobox-II indicate the real-time validity of both approaches, with turn-around times of between 2–80ms, depending on the problem size and if the map is updated. The results indicate that while the IMM-LRKF shows marginally better estimation accuracy, the VB-LRKF is at least a factor of 2 faster.