TR2009-048

Optimal Weighted Antenna Selection For Imperfect Channel Knowledge From Training


    •  Vinod Kristem, Neelesh Mehta, Andreas Molisch, "Optimal Weighted Antenna Selection For Imperfect Channel Knowledge From Training", Tech. Rep. TR2009-048, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, September 2009.
      BibTeX TR2009-048 PDF
      • @techreport{MERL_TR2009-048,
      • author = {Vinod Kristem, Neelesh Mehta, Andreas Molisch},
      • title = {Optimal Weighted Antenna Selection For Imperfect Channel Knowledge From Training},
      • institution = {MERL - Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories},
      • address = {Cambridge, MA 02139},
      • number = {TR2009-048},
      • month = sep,
      • year = 2009,
      • url = {https://www.merl.com/publications/TR2009-048/}
      • }
  • Research Area:

    Communications

Abstract:

Receive antenna selection (AS) reduces the hardware complexity of multi-antenna receivers by dynamically connecting an instantaneously best antenna element to the available radio frequency (RF) chain. Due to the hardware constraints, the channels at various antenna elements have to be sounded sequentially to obtain estimates that are required for selecting the "best" antenna and for coherently demodulating data. Consequently, the channel state information at different antennas is outdated by different amounts. We show that, for this reason, simply selecting the antenna with the highest estimated channel gain is not optimum. Rather, the channel estimates of different antennas should be weighted differently, depending on the training scheme. We derive closed-form expressions for the symbol error probability (SEP) of AS for MPSK and MOAM in time-varying Rayleigh fading channels for arbitrary selection weights, and validate them with simulations. We then derive an explicit formula for the optimal selection weights that minimize the SEP. We find that when selection weights are not used, the SEP need not improve as the number of antenna elements increases, which is in contrast to the ideal channel estimation case. However, the optimal selection weights remedy this situation and significantly improve performance.